top of page

House Democrats Won’t Be Forced to Vote On Pro-Crypto Regulation Bills

A leaked email has revealed that while Democratic Party leaders strongly oppose two Republican-led crypto regulation bills, they will not force House members to vote against them. These bills, the Financial Innovation and Technology for the 21st Century (FIT21) Act and the CBDC Anti-Surveillance State Act, have significant implications for the crypto industry.


House Democrats Won’t Be Forced to Vote On Pro-Crypto Regulation Bills

Key Takeaways:

  1. Democratic Opposition: Key Democratic leaders oppose the FIT21 Act but will not enforce a party-wide vote against it.

  2. Regulatory Clarity: The FIT21 Act aims to clarify whether cryptocurrencies are classified as commodities or securities, enhancing regulatory clarity.

  3. Industry Support: The bill has strong support from major crypto organizations, advocating for its potential to provide a stable regulatory environment.

  4. Criticism and Concerns: Critics within the crypto industry express concerns over the bill's decentralization demands and potential SEC overreach.

  5. Leaked Email: A leaked email obtained by Politico reveals that Democratic leaders strongly oppose the bills but will not whip votes against them, allowing individual members to vote freely.


The Bills in Question

FIT21 Act (H.R. 4763): This bill aims to establish a clearer framework for classifying cryptocurrencies as commodities or securities, primarily placing regulatory authority with the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC). It has garnered substantial support from the U.S. crypto industry, with 60 companies advocating for its passage.


CBDC Anti-Surveillance State Act (H.R. 5403): This bill seeks to prevent the Federal Reserve from issuing a central bank digital currency (CBDC), which some argue could undermine the primacy of the U.S. dollar and hinder monetary policy.


Opposition from Democratic Leaders

Senior Democratic leaders, including Representatives Maxine Waters and David Scott, have expressed strong opposition to FIT21.


They argue that the bill undermines decades of legal precedent, creates uncertainty in the securities market, weakens investor protections, and opens the door to fraud and market manipulation by providing a "safe harbor" for entities.


Leaked Email Reveals Internal Stance

A leaked email obtained by Politico shows that while the Democratic leadership opposes the bills, they will not whip votes against them. This indicates a strategic decision to allow members to vote according to their individual positions, despite the leadership's strong opposition.


Support and Controversy

The FIT21 Act is backed by a coalition of digital asset organizations, including major players like Coinbase, Kraken, and Andreessen Horowitz.


These supporters believe the bill will provide the necessary regulatory clarity for the industry to thrive. However, critics within the crypto industry worry about the bill's high demands for decentralization and the potential for excessive SEC power.


Odds of the Bill Passing

Based on the current count of votes in favor and against the bill, the odds of FIT21 passing appear to be favorable. Several House members have expressed their support, bolstered by the lack of a strict party-line whip against the bill from Democratic leaders. This bipartisan support increases the likelihood of the bill's passage.


Implications and Expectations

The debate and potential passage of FIT21 are expected to have significant implications for the U.S. crypto landscape. The bill's provisions could shape the future of digital asset regulation, impacting both industry practices and investor confidence.


Conclusion

The House of Representatives is set to vote on the Financial Innovation and Technology for the 21st Century (FIT21) Act and the CBDC Anti-Surveillance State Act on Wednesday, May 22. As the debate unfolds, the outcomes of these votes will be closely watched, given their potential to significantly impact the regulatory environment for cryptocurrencies in the United States.

Comments


Market Alleys
Market Alleys
bottom of page